May 27, 2014
8:02 a.m.
+ 1 Norbert Am 26.05.2014 um 19:19 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
Object>>#name should be removed, it is possible, I tried it once. Most senders of #name are asking for the name of a class.
On 26 May 2014, at 18:15, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
Do I understand correctly that name is to be understood as inspectorName and so should never be implemented as subclass responsibility?
Stephan