Ahhhh thatâs how it works⦠StartupPreferencesHandler and its in my user/Library/Preferences/Pharo/6.0 folder⦠You learn something new every day (minute it seems lately) Tim
On 2 Aug 2017, at 14:04, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
Try to run the image with --no-default-preferences.
-- Pavel
2017-08-02 14:37 GMT+02:00 Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works <mailto:tim@testit.works>>: Hey thanks - that seems like a good strategy (I hadnât though of sharing the GT ones as well).
However, Iâm still curious how/why a new image would pick up settings from what I did in another image (at least I think thats what its done - certainly the directory it shows in my fresh image is not File @pharo-local/package-cache like I would expect it to be?
With regards to the GT settings - how does it work if you share them - do they happily co-exist? The stash one is also quite new to me - Sven mentioned it a few weeks ago as I was confused how the playground got saved (Iâm still not clear) - but he suggested double-clicking the title and giving the tab a name. Are these named ones the stashed ones (it looks like it). And do stashed ones honour cmd-s to save them? Which then leads to the question, that in different images - if you share the stash then I guess if you want to reload a file, you close that playground and then pick it again from the list?
Its quite a cool way of working (not perfect) but a real time saver. Thanks for sharing.
Tim
On 2 Aug 2017, at 13:24, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com <mailto:marianopeck@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works <mailto:tim@testit.works>> wrote: Hi - Iâve noticed that when I download a new image+vm with zeroconf (in a fresh directory) - that when I launch it, the setting Tools | Software Config Mgnmnt | Monticello | Local Cache Directory has a value that points to a directory from one of my earlier images.
Is this normal (does it store this information somewhere on my computer so that different setups can access it)?
At first I thought this was annoying - but Iâm now wondering if this is useful as Iâm guessing that there isnât any reason to have separate caches for version controlled libraries and so maybe I should actually set it to some common directory?
What is the recommended strategy?
My strategy is to use a shared repository for all my images. As part of my build image scripts I do something like this:
" =============== Personal Settings ================ "
MCCacheRepository cacheDirectory: '/Users/mariano/Pharo/localRepo/' asFileReference. MCGitHubRepository cacheDirectory: '/Users/mariano/Pharo/localRepo/' asFileReference. GTPlayBook cacheDirectory: '/Users/mariano/Pharo/play-cache/' asFileReference. GTPlayBook stashDirectory: '/Users/mariano/Pharo/play-stash/' asFileReference.
I guess you save stuff:
find /Users/mariano/Pharo/localRepo/ -type f | wc -l 32301
du -sh /Users/mariano/Pharo/localRepo 6.1G /Users/mariano/Pharo/localRepo
Not only you save disk space, but also: 1) Each image build is likely to take less time as many files will be already in the cache (no need to redownload it). 2) it works as a yet another backup of your code and other packages.
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com <http://marianopeck.wordpress.com/>