Hi. 2017-12-31 14:47 GMT+01:00 Andy Burnett <andy.burnett@knowinnovation.com>:
Thanks Ben, That is really interesting. I had completely misunderstood the problem. Checking the items in oc2 shows that they are literally the same object. So, it would seem that I have to run copy, or some other method to get a unique object.
I can see that this would make sense from an efficiency perspective. Reusing the same object would presumably save memory space. However, it would probably be good to update the comment to let people know that this will happen.
What is the process for submitting suggested improvements to class comments?
It's same as any other code. Just follow instructions https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/wiki/Contribute-a-fix-to-Pharo. It is now simplified a lot.
Cheers Andy