May 28, 2014
8:57 p.m.
On 26/5/14 19:19, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Object>>#name should be removed,
+1
it is possible, I tried it once. Most senders of #name are asking for the name of a class.
On 26 May 2014, at 18:15, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
Do I understand correctly that name is to be understood as inspectorName and so should never be implemented as subclass responsibility?
Stephan