andres what can I say? Write PEPs take a couple of them that you think are really important, write them get people involved and we see in 6 or 12 months from now. If it succeeds I will be more than happy. Believe me.
If you had actually considered what has been written in this thread, then you'll realize that throwing a bunch of items in an e-mail has nothing to do with feature requests.
yes this is about building synergy about an idea. (you see I'm not mean I could have say around an idea that nobody has the financial impact to get real)
I find quite contradictory that one of your main arguments is about not having enough contributors and yet take that attitude instead of getting something positive out of the initiative.
But I'm positive: I show you all the features we dream about. Take 3 and build a PEP and succeed building them and we will all be happy.
But I guess I must be wrong, that surely works, It's just me that doesn't understand how.
Andrés
Stéphane Ducasse escribió:
so here is my whislist in no order. - multiwindowing system - native mashup of native elements by os for building widgets - new ui framework (with decent coordinate system) a cool sexy widget set (MVP behind). - vm callable as dll - bootstrappable - distributions + build servers + validated packages - better code browsers and tools - pretty print as you type - cairo backend or opensvg like rendering - faster/cleaner monticello - new filesystem - module system - new mop - UIbuilder and interpreter - good RMI - better JIT - cleaner VM code - faster system - good connection with C libraries - clean and extensible event system - remote debugger - better compiler - cross compilation - better documentation with example - 100% test coverage - better library for connection to database https XML handling web services gluing and extracting info https support network - widget for seaside - scaffolding for CRUD in Seaside - persistency solutions - OODMs - ERP in Smalltalk - ... So ok add yours.