April 12, 2016
12:44 p.m.
I will not add for the moment that predefined types value holders? We would need to add one for each type we support to be consistent, and document it, and add tests. And btw? you do have a generic holder? is just that you need to refine it to what you want :)
Couldn't we use FFIInt32? To me it would make sense to use the class to refer to the type, and an instance of it for a value holder in memory (this is not asking for a change, only reporting it looks strange).
My advise is that you go with what you need, we can consider add predefined value holders later.
Yep, I am sticking to the basic features as much as possible anyway. Cheers, Thibault