I think the Metacello class is from the unreleased beta version. You can get it from here Http://www.github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work I'm not sure if it'll solve your problem or not. On Nov 16, 2012, at 2:27 AM, CHRIS BAILEY <cpmbailey@btinternet.com> wrote:
My Metacello configuration doesn't want to load from FileTree if the monticello.meta directories are missing. This makes some sense to me as it won't be able to resolve any actual version numbers or releases. However all it can possibly do is just grab the packages from disk anyway. I saw something along the lines of Metacello new configuration: xxx; load somewhere whereas I still have my normal ConfigurationOfXXX loadBleedingEdge. But I don't have a Metacello class in my 1.4 Summer image. Do I need to get hold of this?
--- On Thu, 15/11/12, Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] FileTree queries To: "A friendly place where any question about pharo is welcome" <pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Date: Thursday, 15 November, 2012, 17:25 On 11/15/2012 09:16 AM, Chris wrote:
Hi,
I've just migrated to using FileTree with SVN and am wondering if it is possible to use it without the monticello.meta? You obviously get a lot of merge conflicts with these and the version file in particular, and I didn't really see much benefit when using SVN for commit comments and revision histories and so forth so have just been ignoring / deleting them. It seems to work ok for the most part and by loading packages with Gofer, but I feel like I'm fighting the system a bit and have not had much luck with Metacello in particular which I would like to get working again. Can anyone advise?
Thanks Chris
Why not just make SVN ignore those files?
https://sdesmedt.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/how-to-make-subversion-ignore-file...