And I was just starting to wonder how far the weirdness would go ;-) Although I donât know how much further you can go after "emojis over cookies over cookie monsters over garbage gravity graveâ. :-P -- Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I donât mean to be rude! Please see http://emailcharter.org <http://emailcharter.org/> . Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
On 31 Dec 2016, at 07:50, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
Indeed, this is completely incoherent and looks automatically generated.
I unsubscribed the address.
Marcus
On 29 Dec 2016, at 21:14, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com <mailto:stepharo.self@gmail.com>> wrote:
I suggest that we remove from the list this bot.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Charlie Robbats <charlie.robbats@gmail.com <mailto:charlie.robbats@gmail.com>> wrote: 22 - priority queue vatting calls and send stacks: meta over emojis over cookies over cookie monsters over garbage gravity grave
On 12/28/2016 2:22 PM, Charlie Robbats wrote: 19 - I am thinking about merging RS FEC with blockEn/Decoding with a 7-bit msgChunks into 8-bit blocks, or QoS determined. That along with non-secret 3-way finite field key agreement ratcheting and contract established scoping, would mean each transaction might be separately islolated from every other and the contract exchange includes trusted observation filtering capabilities, locally enforced through your prioritized trees of life, liberty & property, and also your knowledge of good and evil.