May 26, 2014
6:14 p.m.
+1 on the removal of Object>>#name. On May 26, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
Object>>#name should be removed, it is possible, I tried it once. Most senders of #name are asking for the name of a class.
On 26 May 2014, at 18:15, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
Do I understand correctly that name is to be understood as inspectorName and so should never be implemented as subclass responsibility?
Stephan
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile