April 20, 2021
12:29 p.m.
Richard O'Keefe wrote
Surely this is back to front? #includesAllOf: reads well and is compatible with GNU Smalltalk (and classic Squeak), while #includesAll: doesn't work in most of the Smalltalks I have access to.
My own library has {includes,excludes}{All,Any,None,One}Of: which wouldn't read nearly so well without "Of".
Yes, this makes sense! I will fix that example Thank you -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html