On 18 May 2017, at 21:08, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com> wrote:
Great! How long has it been there? :)
Apparently since 2012 - can't really remember
And why is it in SequenceableCollection and not SortedCollection?
Hmm, probably because any SequenceableCollection could be sorted up front, like in ((1 to: 100) collect: [ :i | 100 atRandom ]) sort. BTW, we also have #threeWayCompareTo: (the spaceship operator, aka <=>) (((1 to: 100) collect: [ :i | 100 atRandom ]) , #(66)) sort findBinaryIndex: [ :x | 66 threeWayCompareTo: x ]
Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo
2017-05-18 16:01 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
It is already in the image: SequenceableCollection>>#findBinary:do:ifNone: & friends ;-)
On 18 May 2017, at 20:22, PAUL DEBRUICKER <pdebruic@gmail.com> wrote:
I didn't see one in the image & I'm happy to implement one but thought I'd ask before I did.
Thanks
Paul