On Dec 3, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
I think the individual membership should not be free. Being part of the consortium should be meaningful.
So, I propose that a membership requires one of two: 1. make a gift, or 2. present the evidence of three relevant commits to Pharo or adjacent projects.
Of course, most people will fall under the second category anyway. But, like this, when one adds the badge of "Proud Pharo supporter" to his webpage it has a factual meaning.
What do you think?
this is ok for me.
Cheers, Doru
p.s. And 5000 * 2 = 10000. Luckily, it's probably not going to be Stef taking care of the finance details :)
Indeed I was thinking about the about the other range. Stef
On 3 Dec 2011, at 10:00, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
HI
We would like to get your point of view about the following (we discussed with INRIA lawyer and others.
Goal: Remember we want to be able to pay an engineer (cost 55K).
Constraints: We do not want a special license for people participating to the consortium and the others. It means that members may not have immediate advantages like 10% reduction :). But it also means that the system is clean, simple, â¦.
Proposals:
Individual Member: - Free membership
Institutional Member: (like Lab, Universityâ¦.) - 1000 Euros
Company - First level support: 2000-3000 Euros
- Extended Support: 5000-6000 Euros
Then finally we want to have a donation for >500 Euros
Now with these numbers: we can do it. It may be tight but this would be a huge success!
we need 20 first level support 2000 Euros * 20 = 40000 two extended 5000 Euros * 2 = 12000
5 institutionals 5* 1000 = 5000
Gift: 500 * 10 = 5000
So let us know what do you think?
Stef
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."