On 2 November 2016 at 20:36, Henrik Sperre Johansen < henrik.s.johansen@veloxit.no> wrote:
CodeDmitry wrote
Why don't Smalltalk or Smalltalklike languages have checked interfaces? The compilation occurs at runtime but it is still technically a compilation, why don't languages allow implementing interfaces at runtime? The type information is there, and the source can load the list of messages expected and check if the compiled class contains all members or removes it and throws an exception. Is this just too expensive?
<rude mode on> because it's smalltalk. and because you don't come into existing temple with own rules </rude mode still on> well.. i hope you will stay here a little bit longer, to learn and undestand, that what you proposing/asking for is ether already there in one or another form, or simply unnecessary. P.S. please forgive me for being rude, impatient and trollish towards newcomers.. but i just can't help with it. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.