On 19 Jan 2015, at 20:00, <jtuchel@objektfabrik.de> <jtuchel@objektfabrik.de> wrote:
Sven,
I got Richardâs message about ESUG and I asked for facts. It seems you didn't read my full postâ¦
I did read it, it was well written and I agree with what you said. But you were too polite, you give him the benefit of the doubt. I don't think that I have to remind anyone of what ESUG means (now and in the past) for the larger Smalltalk community. I just do not even want to make that comparison, not even for the sake of the discussion.
Joachim
Von: Sven Van Caekenberghe Gesendet: âMontagâ, â19â. âJanuarâ â2015 â19â:â17 An: Any question about pharo is welcome
On 19 Jan 2015, at 17:48, jtuchel@objektfabrik.de wrote:
All that's been said so far is that some people do not like the use of some military terms, no matter where they come from and whether people know what these mean or not. We are not on a crusade, and this is not about conquering anything or anybody.
I am sorry, Joachim, but that is not true: he just said (ok, implicitly) that ESUG is worthless. And he said many more quite hurtful things by stating 'facts' or comparing (as equal or unequal) or rating different projects.
Yes, since he wrote his first 'essay', it seems that he knows more or less what Smalltalk is, further than that I am sceptical.