Hi,
Am 21.03.2017 um 08:04 schrieb Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl>:
On 19/03/17 14:14, Norbert Hartl wrote:
I never managed to take a look at QCMagritte but it sounds as an extension. Why was it never integrated?
It is rather a monolitical extension. And it was mostly in heavy development. We never stopped to make a real release. Somehow the tutorial code and the demo's were not enough to get traction in the community. Probably too much change at a time. I think the design is sound but we never got into discussions/feedback about that.
do you have any documentation that summarizes the changes you did. With all the new mails about magritte and problems it might be time to form a new group caring about a new implementation of a meta-object layer. I think now that we have slots the implementation can be made much more powerful than magritte is today.
We ran into the instance side problem too, and solved that with prototypes. You need them anyway to get better memento's.
Same here. There are times where it seems cumbersome to use the instance side descriptions. But the benefits outweigh that problem by far (for me at least). But I do like the idea that instance _and_ class side descriptions are taken into account. Feels right at first. Norbert