Re: [Pharo-users] not yet / should be implemented

To me NotYetImplemented is not needed => should be implemented is enough Le 28/9/15 21:09, Peter Uhnák a écrit :

What is the difference?

————————————————————————————————————— *ShouldBeImplemented* * * I am ShouldBeImplemented, an exception signaled when some method should have been implemented but was not.

This is more like a placeholder during development. ————————————————————————————————————— *NotYetImplemented*

I am NotYetImplement, an exception signaled when a method is a stub for code that will be implemented in the future.

This is used in incremental development, for example when doing Test First development. It is similar to ShouldBeImplemented, with a slightly different meaning. —————————————————————————————————————

There seem to be some slight semantic difference but I'm failing to see it. I can even say "The method should be implemented, but is not yet implemented." It's saying the same thing with different words.

Thanks, Peter