Hi Jimmie, Le 29/03/2017 à 20:07, Jimmie Houchin a écrit :
What I don't understand from this thread, and my apologies if it was expressed. But to me the question is not what or why happened in the past. Rather what is the way to proceed ahead with a single canonical source. This is what will benefit the community. What and where is that source.
I don't know. I will probably update the github repo by backporting the changes I'm interested in from the smalltalkhub repo, when I'll get the time to do it. There is little pressure to do so: both versions work perfectly well for its usual users, and they are close enough that documentation is the same for both. Tracking changes on the smalltalkhub repo is inconvenient, to say the least: this thing never sends anything to any watcher, to the difference of github, so you can't track anything about updates appearing there. On github, you can subscribe to updates... makes a world of a difference if you have to track a project. If you are still using an old parser on the previous SmaCC version (1.x), you'll have to get yet another SmaCC repository. Regards, Thierry
Shalom.
Jimmie Houchin
On 03/29/2017 12:25 PM, Thierry Goubier wrote:
2017-03-29 18:07 GMT+02:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com <mailto:stepharo.self@gmail.com>>:
Ok I should say that I do not understand the differences and why there are two versions of Smacc. So I will stop maintaining the tutorial because now may be I should revert what I wrote. I was too stupid to do it in fact I should focus on my stuff and nothing else. This saddens me a lot. We are a small community and we split ourselves into little chunks. I do not get why there is no notion of economy and sharing in our culture.
I also don't know why it was done that way. And I don't want to spend energy fighting it.
Thierry
Stef
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com <mailto:tudor@tudorgirba.com>> wrote:
Hi,
> On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com <mailto:stepharo.self@gmail.com>> wrote: > > OK > I loaded Smacc from github as mentioned by thierry. > > Metacello new > baseline: 'SmaCC'; > repository: 'github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC'; > load > > Are there two configurationOfSmacc? > May be we should only have one no? > > I have the impression that even thierry and jason working heavily with Smacc do not know that. > And we should not force them to use Moose. At least we do not have to win > anything with it.
I did not mean to force anyone to use Moose. I just said it is already loaded there, in case you use it.
Moose relies on the ConfigurationOfSmaCC maintained by John. Thierry has another repository that he created before John moved his work to Pharo. But, now that he does work with Pharo Moose relies on his version.
Cheers, Doru
> > Stef > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com <mailto:tudor@tudorgirba.com>> wrote: > They come with the ConfigurationOfSmaCC which is already in the Moose image. > > Doru > > > > On Mar 27, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com <mailto:stepharo.self@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > where can I load the Smacc gt extension and debugger extensions? > > > > Stef > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com> > www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com> > > "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier." > > >
-- www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com> www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com>
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."