Generally speaking, the storage strategy should be dissociated from the hashed functionality that is to be provided. In other words, open addressing linear probing and hash buckets should be swappable under set (or dictionary, etc). On 10/18/10 9:31 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
and we should clean it because it was introduced a bit fast in pharo :)
On Oct 18, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
HashedCollection is an abstract base class, which contains common behavior for all hash-based collections, including Set, Dictionary etc.
On 18 October 2010 13:04, Benjamin Van Ryseghem <benjamin.vanryseghem@gmail.com> wrote:
I was looking in Pharo sources and I do not understand the difference between Set and HashedCollection which both seems to work the same way.
Benjamin _______________________________________________ Pharo-users mailing list Pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-users mailing list Pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
_______________________________________________ Pharo-users mailing list Pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users