so it is not a good idea for an open source project, as I feared.
On 13 Jan 2017, at 09:15, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:
It eventually disappears , it keep the last 10.000 messages
No it's not publicly visible quite the contrary , Slack prioritize privacy because it's meant to be used by teams working on commercial projects which are the ones more likely to pay for a slack subscription.
If you want to search as a teams's history you need to gain access as a guest or a member , in both cases you will need an invite. So it makes little sense for Slack to give Google Acess to its teams history.
If you as a team want to have unlimited messages then you will need to pay for the Slack subscription.
Of course none can stop us from creating a bot that will copy the messages to an HTML website , that Google can search, hence lifting the 10k limit as well. Or even better commit those messages to a github repo that can be loaded as a project inside a Pharo image On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 at 10:05, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote: so it is not publicly available/visible/indexable ?
so everything written there basically disappears ?
On 13 Jan 2017, at 09:01, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:
Slack encrypts the message history and it only stores 10.000 messages
You could use the Slack search feature
https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/202528808-Search-for-messages-and-f...
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 at 08:40, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
and slack is closed, right ?
On 13 Jan 2017, at 01:36, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:
Google already is capable on focusing on Pharo related websites.
The core of our documentation is located on 3 websites
World.st , this sites includes a forum website for all the Smalltalk related mailing lists
Stackoverflow, Pharo has its own tag and a ton of answered questions
Github.com, here are located all the Pharo books
So to search all documentation about Spec on only these 3 websites you use the following search query
pharo spec site:world.st OR site:stackoverflow.com OR site:github.com
There are other ways to customize a google search query , please look at google search documentation
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 at 11:38, Siemen Baader <siemenbaader@gmail.com> wrote:
Has anybody looked into SEO'ing any of the great documentation and archived questions on the mailing list?
It strikes me that I often can't find the answer to questions I have on Google, but they are often answered in material that I can find when I look manually for some time or am pointed at it by an experienced member of the community.
I also miss Pharo - content on Stackoverflow, it is a very efficient way to get past road blocks quickly.
Any thoughts or history to bring me up to speed with?
cheers,
Siemen