Why not use the condition macro so you have a single string literal, that in the future could be used for translation? E.g. | occurences | occurences := 3. 'There <1?is:are> <2p> <1?occurrence:ocurrences> of <3p>' expandMacrosWith: occurences = 1 with: 3 with: 'Foo' Esteban A. Maringolo El mié., 20 feb. 2019 a las 18:08, Tim Mackinnon (<tim@testit.works>) escribió:
I was browsing some of the Pharo issues (always worth doing) - and noticed an interesting one about Test results reporting and pluralisation (https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/2578)
In it, I hadn't noticed String>>asPluralBasedOn: before (and judging from many messages in the image, many others hadn't either).
I'm fixing something similar for a refactoring bug and can use this technique there (although from memory, it comes with a health warning as if ever we want to internalise the messages in Pharo, this will need a different approach). However we are probably a distance from doing that - so cleaning up what we have is a good start.
Anyway I was curious if there is something to help with messages like:
âThere is 1 occurrence of {1}â vs âThere are many occurrences of {1}â, which Iâd like to write something like:
âThere â, (âis 1 â, âare many â) pick: result size, âoccurrenceâ asPluralBasedOn: result size, â â, result printString.
Tim