Am 25.04.2014 um 06:51 schrieb Joachim Tuchel <jtuchel@objektfabrik.de>:
Hi,
We're using Glorp on VA ST for kontolino.de. It is an active project in the sense of somebody is taking care of bugs. The lead developer(s) work(s) for Cincom - and Cincom uses Glorp as supported component of CST. Instantiations also provides Glorp with VA ST and supports it. Glorp is very stable and is not moving fast, which is not a disadvantage for a production system. Features are being added and bugs are fixed.
Re: Pharoers do NoSQL: judging from the discussions on this list and others, you have to be careful what you need. To me it seems many developers want features from relational DBs and hammer them into their applications with brute force. The first wow! soon gives room to a lot of problems that have been solved in relational DBs three decades ago.
I think such a statement should be based on an example.
But it is true that o/r mapping is not always fun. It can force you to make decisions about your model that look strange from the object perspective.
Agreed. And especially in the context of O/R I'm curious what will be your example to prove your point above. Couldn't resist, Norbert
I'd either go full objects (gemstone, magma) or relational for my typical projects (business apps).
Hth
Joachim
Clément Bera <bera.clement@gmail.com> schrieb:
Hello,
I think Glorp is used with DBXTalk for relational databases by multiple people.
Usually, with Pharo, people use as a persistance layer either MongoDB with the frameworks MongoTalk/Voyage.
Gemstone is also used quite often for large scale application but Gemstone is not free.
Regards.
2014-04-23 20:34 GMT-07:00 Pablo R. Digonzelli <pdigonzelli@gmail.com>:
Hi all, can someone tell me if glorp is active there ar is using glorp or other persistence framework in production projects?
Tia
Ing. Pablo Digonzelli Software Solutions IP-Solutiones SRL Metrotec SRL 25 de Mayo 521 Email: pdigonzelli@softsargentina.com pdigonzelli@gmail.com Cel: 5493815982714