May 7, 2013
6:08 p.m.
+1 On May 7, 2013, at 7:59 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2013-05-07, at 19:03, Andrei Vasile Chis <chisvasileandrei@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Given that SmalltalkHub is now stable we were considering to discontinue SqueakSource. Our idea is to provide a grace period of a couple of months to allow the current active users to migrate their projects to the new service and then simply put squeaksource in read-only mode (simply exposing the directory structure and allowing downloads).
What do you think about it ? Are there any good reasons to still keep SqueakSource alive?
I don't really think so. Read-only mode is perfect, you only waste time to relaunch squeaksource when it crashes :)