April 7, 2015
7:38 a.m.
On 05 Apr 2015, at 10:46, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 04/04/2015 18:02, stepharo a écrit :
Thierry
this means that generating ring objects would help you?
Maybe. Or maybe unifying Ring with what RB already does with its models (RBClass, etc...), and ensuring that Opal can work with those (at least do the bindings part, count the literals, etc...).
I feel like Pharo has three competing ways of modeling software items: MCDefinition stuff, Ring, RB stuff.
Yes! We should look at unifying RB and Ring⦠Marcus