I think we've safely established that the bottleneck is disk operations. Quoting from previous emails... store := [ method putSource: code inFile: 2 withPreamble: [:f | f cr; nextPut: $!; nextChunkPut: 'Behavior method'; cr]. ]. machine 1: Debian 64bit (laptop) store bench. 41604 per second Windows XP 32bit (virtualbox; host Debian) store bench. 286 per second Ubuntu 32bit (virtualbox; host Debian) store bench. 36604 per second machine 2: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (desktop pc) store bench. 13 per second machine 3: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (laptop) store bench. 454 per second all disks are HDD. On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:03 PM, phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
Silly question: do you have a couple of Nautilus windows open?
Loading stuff generates annoucements and Nautilus updates are killing performance.
And previously TestRunner too (don;t know now)
Phil Le 30 juin 2015 00:36, "Jan BlizniÄenko" <bliznjan@fit.cvut.cz> a écrit :
And one another benchmark of linux in VM on that desktop PC: Roassal loading - 58 s compilations per second - avg: 262.4682, min: 257.194, max: 289.684 ...so the desktop PC is capable of better result and problem is somewhere in Windows, which I was afraid of...
I'd also like to add to previous Windows tests that with antivirus turned on everything takes more time approximately by half of original time.
Jan
Jan BlizniÄenko wrote
Desktop: 386 s. Notebook: 48 s. Linux in VM on notebook: 27 s.
Notebook: compilations per second - avg: 217.7153, min: 5.0, max: 247.258 Desktop: compilations per second - avg: 23.1337, min: 19.448, max: 28.155 Linux in VM on notebook: compilations per second - avg: 529. 0066600000001, min: 5.0, max: 573.97
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Slow-compilation-on-one-of-my-Windows-PCs-tp4834668p48... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com