March 27, 2015
10:42 a.m.
On 27 Mar 2015, at 11:37, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Either TextModel should have configuration methods #beForCode and #beForText or there should be TextModel and a CodeModel (sub)class.
And from what you say, the plain variant is not even provided in Spec.
I agree, please open issue for it.
Peter
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15237/Spec-TextModel-for-plain-text