That's perfect, thank you! Nicolas On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:39 PM, David T. Lewis <lewis@mail.msen.com> wrote:
Yes, that is the correct way to do it.
I think that the ConfigurationOfOSProcess for Pharo includes a portion of the CommandShell package, so if you load OSProcess from that configuration you should also get the necessary PipeableOSProcess. That said, I would still encourage you to load the full CommandShell package and explore some of the other things it it :-)
ConfigurationOfOSProcess and ConfigurationOfCommandShell have both been recently updated for Pharo.
Dave
Hi,
I am doing some work with OSProcess and I want to get the output directly to pharo (i.e. a stream or a byteString would be cool). I have found this on the web http://pharo.gemtalksystems.com/book/PharoTools/OSProcess/ where it's said that if you want access to the output you have to use PipeableOSProcess from CommandShell project. My question is: is still this the correct way to do it or meanwhile in OSProcess something was implemented to handle this specific case?
Thanks. Cheers, Nicolas