Yeah!!! That would be really cool! Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. On Sep 26, 2014, at 4:02 PM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Hi!
Alejandro and I are working on a new profiling technique to identify redundant objects.
Weâve heard there are some effort on increasing the range of identity hash values. Currently, it goes up to 4096, which is not much. Can someone tell us about this? Check the spur format on clement's blog. If I remember we will have 12 bits for hashes soon.
Also, I discovered that -100 hash = -100. Does this make sense?
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.