Hi, using the bitbucket:// scheme and authority leads to a download url of https://bitbucket.org/NorbertHartl/get/<password>@2denker.zip where NorbertHartl and <password> are the credentials and 2denker is the user. The project name is stripped off. So this does not work as expected. Norbert
Am 26.01.2016 um 13:03 schrieb Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name>:
Am 25.01.2016 um 23:32 schrieb Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com>>:
Le 25/01/2016 23:13, Norbert Hartl a écrit :
Am 25.01.2016 um 23:02 schrieb Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name <mailto:norbert@hartl.name>>:
Hi,
Am 25.01.2016 um 22:55 schrieb Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com <mailto:thierry.goubier@gmail.com>>:
Hi Norbert,
Just tell me if you need any additional parameter to the git clone for the credentials, because I'm not sure I have written the code which will handle them.
I'll check that. The easiest approach is to use the authority part of the url like
https://user:pass@bitbucket.org/ <https://user:pass@bitbucket.org/>â¦.
I'm nearly sure my code doesn't check for them and silently drop them :(
I try that tomorrow.
But then I don't think that sub-directories work per http.
They do over https. But remember the syntax is, to take your url,
gitfiletree://user:pass@bitbucket.org/...?protocol=https <gitfiletree://user:pass@bitbucket.org/...?protocol=https>
Does not work for me. It complains about unknown url scheme. But using the read-only version of gitfiletree would still mean I have to install gitfiletree, no? I have no glue hot the url with bitbucket:// could work.
I wonder if I can write code that considers that if you have a username and a password, then it should use https and not ssh.
I see no reason why. You can use ssh with username and password as well.
Norbert