On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Andreas Brodbeck <dassi@mindclue.ch> wrote:
Am 28.11.17 um 11:13 schrieb H. Hirzel:
Hello Andreas
Unfortunately Fuel is not meant for this kind of use case of migrating an object model.
That's sad to hear. From 1.4 to 6.1 is a big step, I agree, but I really thought that Fuel can be considered as a good "transport vehicle" at least for small steps like from Pharo 5 to 6.
Yes, watching it from now, I think this was our biggest drawback of fuel.
So other options have to be considered.
That probably would be a custom mechanism storing objects in a database or fileformat and re-import, I think. Lots of work and very error prone. But maybe the only way unfortunately ...
SIXX would be an option you think?
No. SIXX doesn't know how to deal with closures.
Does your object model have cycles?
Yes.
Regards, Andreas
-- Andreas Brodbeck www.mindclue.ch
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com