Sean, good point about dev vs. prod. Thanks for adding. I was indeed talking about development images. There is no loss of code in a runtime image, because you usually don't ship the "original" devleopment image... Of course, chances are a production image crashes when you ship bugs, but it' won't loose code. Joacim
"Sean P. DeNigris" <sean@clipperadams.com mailto:sean@clipperadams.com > hat am 11. Oktober 2019 um 20:07 geschrieben:
jtuchel wrote
> > I guess this has its roots in long-ongoing discussions about the
anticipated disadvantages of image-based development in general.
> I would also add that IMHO a lot of (or maybe almost all) the angst of
possible image crashes comes during development (with increasing risks as experiments get more exotic or delve deeper into the kernel), not deployment. Crashing may be less of an issue now for professional use since there is a development/deployment distinction, unlike historically and in a pure Dynabook vision where all users are developers.
----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html