yes! Now I would love to have time doing something instead of talking (nothing against you - now I can print here ----) Stef On Aug 30, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Maybe Collections-Kernel i.e. not Collection, but Collections ?
On 27 August 2010 16:37, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi guys
I'm starting to work on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2635 which I split into http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2875
Now after I will apply Seaside decomposition to have Test "in their package"
Tests-ToolBuilder -> ToolBuilder-Test
Now in addition I would like to have
Kernel the right stuff there
Collection-Kernel Containing what is needed for the core I prefer that to Kernel-Collection since people that want to look at collection will fin it grouped in Collection but the kernel means that we know that they will be for the kernel Now for Array we will have
Array will be in Collection-Kernel Collection-Kernel-Test
Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-users mailing list Pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-users mailing list Pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users