On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 09/02/17 17:05, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
but all the projects are coming from RMOD team, but having all the projects proposal coming from the same place might be perceived negatively from Google. Can we add more projects from previous gsoc from other people also ?
My two earlier proposals are fine, and already on the site.
Can you reduce the size of the "Distributed Issue Tracker" subject because there is too much details compared to other subjects.
Sorry I'm late with this feedback... For the "Distributed Issue Tracker" I read "The recent decision by Google to deprecate and stop its API for the Google Issue Tracker" So how recent was this? I thought it was a few years ago when Fogbugz was adopted. This strikes me as a poor presentation of our capability to execute GSoC. For a timely correction, I'd done this... https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-project-proposals/pull/33 Two commits a. No text changes. Inserted new lines to make it more readable in editor. b. Shrunk test of DIT project. cheers -ben