Jan. 21, 2018
4:40 p.m.
Cedrick
My goal is one step at a time. I do not want grand plan. Just something working in one image.
Yes sure. But at this is an important requirement for me, I prefer to talk about it first :)
Stef
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Cédrick Béler <cdrick65@gmail.com> wrote:
Besides all suggested ideas on the previous mail, whatâs very important to me is being able to run processes between several images considering 1 image = 1 actor.
At first, we can consider both actor being on the same image (what Stephane wants first) but my requirement number 1 is having 1 actor by image and therefore having the possibility to trigger DistantSubWorkflow.
Cheers,
Cédrick