Re: [Pharo-users] is this better regarding naming thigs

hi, I'm just starting out w/ pharo and have a question re your code; specifically, in reject: [ :word | (word sameAs: aWord) or: [ word asLowercase asBag ~= charBag ] ] is that inner block needed? would it be less smalltalk-esque to write, say: reject: [ :w | (w = aWord) or: (w asLowercase asBag ~= charBag) ] thx! separately recently I watched an alan kay interview in which he says an oo program is typically much smaller than its imperative counterpart and i wondered why. Well, it seems that reduction comes from the language/system providing a zillion methods -- asBag, here -- one would otherwise need to implement, oneself :) -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html