Looks like to be a spam⦠Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jan 15, 2015, at 1:57 PM, laura <laura.risani@gmail.com> wrote:
How was it implemented? Were you building it as an additional package for the system? How would it support browsability and discoverability?
I had in mind a wiki-like catalog hosted on the official page composed by: -A tree of categories (like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_software_categories , it doesn't have to be complete from the start, categories could be added a posteriori when needed) -A set of tags (nice add, but prescindible) -For each included package, a page specifying a set of predefined fields (description/purpose, owners contact, links to documentation if available ).
Those familliar with a package could submit it's fileds information, and a rotating group of volunteers could handle its approval and edting a new page for it. Or should anyone be able to edit?
I think hosting it in the official page is best because it would be indexable by any web search engine , unrestrictedly visible and could be exported by other tools.
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Useful-tools-tp4799187p4799760.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.