+1 to subpackages as denomination for tags if they're going to be used only to organize things hierarchically inside a package instead of used across packages. Cheers, Offray On 03/06/15 13:42, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Sergio Fedi wrote
If something is a tag, then you should be able to apply multiple tags to something.
If not, then they are, as you say, subpackages. Agreed. Actually, tags are more interesting as they would be much more valuable to users, who want a logical domain view of the system. Currently, the package tree we provide is more a Package Browser than a System Browser.
And... tags are orthogonal to packages. The way we use them, sub-packages seems more correct.
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Video-Tutorial-Package-Tags-tp4830133p4830290.ht... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.