March 26, 2018
6:07 p.m.
reading the bug entry is worth Thanks for posting it. Stef On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:04 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi herbert
I did not read the issue but I imagine that it may be linked to the fact that it raises an exception or not. Now streams can also be infinite so atEnd: for them is always false.
Stef
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:51 PM, Herbert VojÄÃk <herby@mailbox.sk> wrote:
Citing from https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21577/Cannot-read-from-dev-urandom,
But we still shouldn't be relying on #atEnd so ... -- Alistair Grant
Why should we not rely on #atEnd? I had the impression that it is one of the most fundamental stream APIs, alongside next, nextPut: and reset.
Herby