Re: [Pharo-users] Pillar parser rewrite: PetitParser or not?

I completely agree. I think there are mostly pros. It can be that the parsing will be slower, but I do not think this is a critical issue for Pillar. It would be more important to have an extensible parser. Cheers, Doru On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

The current pillar parser has several problems:

- it is hard to understand and change - it discards input locations

I think a refactor or rewrite is necessary. What are the pros and cons of using PetitParser to do that?

Best

-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"