On 25 Jul 2014, at 21:25, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs@gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
Sven,
I'm using Pharo3.0 and it appears that the .st scripts have to be located in the same directory as the image and changes files ... I see that you are using Pharo4.0 ...
So is it possible to get Pharo3.0 to work on .st files in arbitary directores?
Are you using the shebang or direct version ? In any case, I am always using absolute paths. Does that not work for you ?
Dale
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 24 Jul 2014, at 16:34, phil@highoctane.be wrote:
One question I have is how fast the load of an image and processing by an image is when compared with bash.
Obviously, it is slower, there is a whole image that needs to be loaded, etc.
$ cat test.st #!/Users/sven/tmp/pharo4/pharo-vm/Pharo.app/Contents/MacOS/Pharo --headless /Users/sven/tmp/pharo4/Pharo.image st --quit FileStream stdout nextPutAll: 42 factorial asString; cr.
$ time ./test.st 1405006117752879898543142606244511569936384000000000
real 0m0.644s user 0m0.516s sys 0m0.067s
So about half a second overhead.
Sven