Yes, the distinction is blurred, i am good with OOP but won't dive too deep (i might drown :o) On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:34 PM, TedvG TedvG <tedvga@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, but a bit simplified: As a "typical application programmer" I consider myself as a "pharo-user" (that is why I am here.) Pharo/Smalltalk I really like as an application development tool. made by people like you (grateful, thanks), who dive deeper in Pharo "itself", so to speak So that is why I come with typical "user" questions and long term thoughts about usability and so on. Simply said: I wont' touch much of the "deeper world" in the image, but put my own application object layer on it. That is so nice about Smalltalk. (not making any money with it, I am outta work at the moment :o|
-
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2 May 2011 22:59, Ted F.A. van Gaalen <tedvga@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Igor ?? Shouldn't I be writing Pharo/Seaside apps with it? I am definitely a *user* Â Of Pharo/Seaside if I do..
hmm.. i don't know.. i were always thinking that those who writing applications are developers, and those who using applications, who don't understand what program is, what is the code, and how it works are users.. but maybe times had changed and now writing an application no longer means that you are developer, but just some kind of power-user? :)
Regards Ted
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Ramon Leon <ramon.leon@allresnet.com> wrote:
El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 22:43 +0200, Igor Stasenko escribió:
Pharo is end-user application for developers, not for users :)
+1, that's why I prefer Pharo over Squeak.
-- Ramon Leon http://onsmalltalk.com
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.