Letâs turn this energy into something positive. Please propose a concrete set of default keybindings that you think would work better. In this process, please take into account all keybindings that are already defined in the code editor (it might not be so easy as it appears).
As I've said: 1. can we unify the shift vs ctrl+shift nonsense? (I'm using linux btw) 2. can we use the default shortcuts pattern where one of the letters is underlined? as for the shortcuts themselves, problem is proceed, restart & into proceed: ctrl+shift+p is not taken, so I don't see why it has shortcut confusing with restart restart: ctrl+shift+r indents, but I'd argue that uniformity is more important here... indent is just convenience into: ctrl+shift+i is taken (I've never used it, but it maybe it's important), but we can still use ctrl+shift+n and underline n (point 2) If points 1 & 2 are implemented, then the letter is not as important, although first letter is always preferable. Peter
Cheers, Doru
On Apr 16, 2016, at 8:37 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting fed-up with GTDebugger shortcuts since they are completely random.
Can we have them more meaningful and/or somehow visible?
For now I ended up overriding the labels so I can at least see them... but doing this is also stupid, because I still have to look at them since I cannot remember random shortcuts.
<debugger.png> â 1. can we unify the shift vs ctrl+shift nonsense? (I'm using linux btw) 2. can we use the default shortcuts pattern where one of the letters is underlined?
Peter
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com
"Value is always contextual."