This is another subject and another functionality I will need too. The Rst link is of interest (thank you Denis) , I was thinking of sending command objects with Fuel as all images will have the same classes and performance is not very important here. I was able to load RST in Pharo3, but did not made any test yet. Does it works with Pharo ? @SKrish you are right, but I want to keep as simple as possible at the beginning and tcpip should fit for a start. Cheers, Alain Le 07/10/2014 21:40, S Krish a écrit :
Typical issue in the EJB world : Remote Beans / Local Beans , though on inter process it was remote beans with its full stack RMI marshalling / unmarshalling.
But can we not exploit shared memory and efficient Event mechanism to make the two process coordinate, that should be lot more efficient than TCP - IP / but if that performance suffices it would be fine..
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Alain Rastoul <alf.mmm.cat@gmail.com <mailto:alf.mmm.cat@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi, I played a bit with ZnServer and other zinc components and have a question I can't answer myself (googling a bit didn't help neither), and I'm seeking for advice: does it makes sense to use a ZnServer/ZnWebSocket as a mechanism to transfer data between two pharo processes - in my case 8k ByteArray blocks ? Or is it a total non sense ? is it reliable ? First tests looks good : 18k blocks / second (145 Mb/s) on a laptop core i5 2.6Ghz.
All comments and suggestions welcome
Thanks in advance,
Alain