Re: [Pharo-users] RPackage extension methods using normal protocol names

On 30 Apr 2015, at 17:07, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:

...

On 30 Apr 2015, at 16:44, Ben Coman <btc@openInWorld.com <mailto:btc@openInWorld.com>> wrote:

I saw recently how VisualWorks extensions use normal protocol names http://ia902605.us.archive.org/25/items/St4u181ClassExtensionsInVisualworks/... <http://ia902605.us.archive.org/25/items/St4u181ClassExtensionsInVisualworks/...>

Now that Pharo has got real package objects with RPackage, how possible is the VW convention? It would facilitate porting code.

I would like to… the * is really not nice. But we have a really long TODO already.

yes… it was (and it is) in our TODO. Sadly there are things with more priority now :( Esteban

Marcus