[Pharo-project] Dev09.12.1 does not look nice on Linux
Hi, the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits. Dev09.11.4 looks fine Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
Hi, I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VM Squeak-3.11.3.2135. See: http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467 Laurent 2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@gmail.com>
Hi, the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits. Dev09.11.4 looks fine Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
but why the previous verson of pharo worked fine? there must be something different in this new image... 2009/12/8 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>:
Hi, I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VMÂ Â Squeak-3.11.3.2135. See:Â http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467 Laurent
2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@gmail.com>
Hi,  the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files  I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits.  Dev09.11.4 looks fine  Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
The default fonts were changed, now Bitmap StrikeFonts are used instead of a TrueType font. Thus, the rendering method is completely different, and the use in StrikeFont rendering of some BitBlt methods revealed bugs in the alpha channel handling in said methods that previously went unnoticed. (Thus an updated VM/BitBlt plugin in required for them to render correctly). Cheers, Henry On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:27 44PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
but why the previous verson of pharo worked fine? there must be something different in this new image...
2009/12/8 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>:
Hi, I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VM Squeak-3.11.3.2135. See: http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467 Laurent
2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@gmail.com>
Hi, the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits. Dev09.11.4 looks fine Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
but why the previous verson of pharo worked fine? there must be something different in this new image...
It uses pre-rendered sub-pixel fonts instead of rendering the fonts via FreeType. (Much faster, not quite as nice in details). Freetype fonts are available if needed, though. The pre-rendered fonts just replace the 80ties=looking Squeak fonts and provide a good enough selection for a development image. Marcus
2009/12/8 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>:
Hi, I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VM Squeak-3.11.3.2135. See: http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467 Laurent
2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@gmail.com>
Hi, the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits. Dev09.11.4 looks fine Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Would be nice to expose the technique used in FreeType for underline/strikeout... even if only stub where rendered by a StrikeFont. Would help a lot for other canvas types (PDF, PostScript etc.)... For instance, a P{DF canvas would draw the underline using graphics primitives... Regards, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Denker" <denker@acm.org> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Dev09.12.1 does not look nice on Linux
On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
but why the previous verson of pharo worked fine? there must be something different in this new image...
It uses pre-rendered sub-pixel fonts instead of rendering the fonts via FreeType. (Much faster, not quite as nice in details). Freetype fonts are available if needed, though. The pre-rendered fonts just replace the 80ties=looking Squeak fonts and provide a good enough selection for a development image.
Marcus
2009/12/8 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>:
Hi, I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VM Squeak-3.11.3.2135. See: http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467 Laurent
2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@gmail.com>
Hi, the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits. Dev09.11.4 looks fine Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
It should be explained somewhere how to replace StrikeFonts for FreeType. Or even better, a preference for that maybe be cool. On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2@btinternet.com>wrote:
Would be nice to expose the technique used in FreeType for underline/strikeout... even if only stub where rendered by a StrikeFont.
Would help a lot for other canvas types (PDF, PostScript etc.)... For instance, a P{DF canvas would draw the underline using graphics primitives...
Regards, Gary
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Denker" <denker@acm.org> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Dev09.12.1 does not look nice on Linux
On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
but why the previous verson of pharo worked fine? there must be something different in this new image...
It uses pre-rendered sub-pixel fonts instead of rendering the fonts via FreeType. (Much faster, not quite as nice in details). Freetype fonts are available if needed, though. The pre-rendered fonts just replace the 80ties=looking Squeak fonts and provide a good enough selection for a development image.
Marcus
2009/12/8 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>:
Hi, I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VM
Squeak-3.11.3.2135.
See: http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467 Laurent
2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@gmail.com>
Hi, the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits. Dev09.11.4 looks fine Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Why a preference? Its just a matter of selecting the font you like: System > Preferences > System fonts In the Font Browser you can click on "Update" and you *should* get all your system fonts. The problem is, that the font browser does not update. If you open it again, you see the fonts. I filed an issue for 1.0/1.1: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1562 Adrian On Dec 8, 2009, at 19:25 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
It should be explained somewhere how to replace StrikeFonts for FreeType. Or even better, a preference for that maybe be cool.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2@btinternet.com
wrote:
Would be nice to expose the technique used in FreeType for underline/strikeout... even if only stub where rendered by a StrikeFont.
Would help a lot for other canvas types (PDF, PostScript etc.)... For instance, a P{DF canvas would draw the underline using graphics primitives...
Regards, Gary
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Denker" <denker@acm.org> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Dev09.12.1 does not look nice on Linux
On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
but why the previous verson of pharo worked fine? there must be something different in this new image...
It uses pre-rendered sub-pixel fonts instead of rendering the fonts via FreeType. (Much faster, not quite as nice in details). Freetype fonts are available if needed, though. The pre-rendered fonts just replace the 80ties=looking Squeak fonts and provide a good enough selection for a development image.
Marcus
2009/12/8 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>:
Hi, I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VM
Squeak-3.11.3.2135.
See: http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467 Laurent
2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@gmail.com>
Hi, the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits. Dev09.11.4 looks fine Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
I tried that but I didn't know it was not refreshing :-) We found and reported this problem a few months ago with Juan Manuel Vuletich (the alpha channel error) BTW, on Mac, the monticello browser's buttons don't look good nether On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Why a preference? Its just a matter of selecting the font you like:
System > Preferences > System fonts
In the Font Browser you can click on "Update" and you *should* get all your system fonts. The problem is, that the font browser does not update. If you open it again, you see the fonts.
I filed an issue for 1.0/1.1:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1562
Adrian
On Dec 8, 2009, at 19:25 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
It should be explained somewhere how to replace StrikeFonts for FreeType. Or even better, a preference for that maybe be cool.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2@btinternet.com
wrote:
Would be nice to expose the technique used in FreeType for underline/strikeout... even if only stub where rendered by a StrikeFont.
Would help a lot for other canvas types (PDF, PostScript etc.)... For instance, a P{DF canvas would draw the underline using graphics primitives...
Regards, Gary
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Denker" <denker@acm.org> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Dev09.12.1 does not look nice on Linux
On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
but why the previous verson of pharo worked fine? there must be something different in this new image...
It uses pre-rendered sub-pixel fonts instead of rendering the fonts via FreeType. (Much faster, not quite as nice in details). Freetype fonts are available if needed, though. The pre-rendered fonts just replace the 80ties=looking Squeak fonts and provide a good enough selection for a development image.
Marcus
2009/12/8 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>:
Hi, I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VM
Squeak-3.11.3.2135.
See: http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467 Laurent
2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@gmail.com>
Hi, the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits. Dev09.11.4 looks fine Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Why a preference? Its just a matter of selecting the font you like:
System > Preferences > System fonts
In the Font Browser you can click on "Update" and you *should* get all your system fonts. The problem is, that the font browser does not update. If you open it again, you see the fonts.
Excellent :) I wasn't aware of this! really cool.
I filed an issue for 1.0/1.1:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1562
Adrian
On Dec 8, 2009, at 19:25 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
It should be explained somewhere how to replace StrikeFonts for FreeType. Or even better, a preference for that maybe be cool.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2@btinternet.com
wrote:
Would be nice to expose the technique used in FreeType for underline/strikeout... even if only stub where rendered by a StrikeFont.
Would help a lot for other canvas types (PDF, PostScript etc.)... For instance, a P{DF canvas would draw the underline using graphics primitives...
Regards, Gary
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Denker" <denker@acm.org> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Dev09.12.1 does not look nice on Linux
On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
but why the previous verson of pharo worked fine? there must be something different in this new image...
It uses pre-rendered sub-pixel fonts instead of rendering the fonts via FreeType. (Much faster, not quite as nice in details). Freetype fonts are available if needed, though. The pre-rendered fonts just replace the 80ties=looking Squeak fonts and provide a good enough selection for a development image.
Marcus
2009/12/8 laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>:
Hi, I had the same issue with exupery vm. Works with VM
Squeak-3.11.3.2135.
See: http://n2.nabble.com/New-pharo-images-td4125021.html#a4125467 Laurent
2009/12/8 Hernan Wilkinson <hernan.wilkinson@gmail.com>
Hi, the last version's fonts look really bad. See attached files I have Ubuntu 9.10, 64 bits. Dev09.11.4 looks fine Maybe is a preference setting? Hernan
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (7)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Gary Chambers -
Henrik Johansen -
Hernan Wilkinson -
laurent laffont -
Marcus Denker -
Mariano Martinez Peck