[Pharo-project] Filesystem and FS extensions in Pharo book
Hey I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready. My suggestion: ---- Pharo Tools ---- ---- Filesystem ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated. What do you think? Max
right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes Stef On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
Hey
I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
My suggestion:
---- Pharo Tools ---- ---- Filesystem ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated. What do you think?
Max
Yes, I understand that. My question is if I should create entries for the "old" version since that one is working and has working extensions. Max On 22.03.2011, at 13:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
Stef
On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
Hey
I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
My suggestion:
---- Pharo Tools ---- ---- Filesystem ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated. What do you think?
Max
Max, don't worry too much about that. The idea is just to have a list of the available tools and a little description of what they are. Think of this for business or newcomers. If they go ahead with Pharo, then they will probably ask in the mailing list if they have a problem running/installing a tool. So, what you said, is good for me. Cheers mariano On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I understand that. My question is if I should create entries for the "old" version since that one is working and has working extensions.
Max
On 22.03.2011, at 13:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
Stef
On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
Hey
I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
My suggestion:
---- Pharo Tools ---- ---- Filesystem ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated. What do you think?
Max
Max if you want to help what you can do is to have a look at the Filesystem chapter in the pharo by example vol 2 on github. We will update it and probably should do several passes on the chapter anyway. Stef
Yes, I understand that. My question is if I should create entries for the "old" version since that one is working and has working extensions.
Max
On 22.03.2011, at 13:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
Stef
On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
Hey
I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
My suggestion:
---- Pharo Tools ---- ---- Filesystem ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated. What do you think?
Max
Ok, will do. Max On 22.03.2011, at 18:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Max if you want to help what you can do is to have a look at the Filesystem chapter in the pharo by example vol 2 on github. We will update it and probably should do several passes on the chapter anyway. Stef
Yes, I understand that. My question is if I should create entries for the "old" version since that one is working and has working extensions.
Max
On 22.03.2011, at 13:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
Stef
On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
Hey
I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
My suggestion:
---- Pharo Tools ---- ---- Filesystem ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated. What do you think?
Max
what we should do is also to merge our changes in the latest version of colin ;( but we should move on that front too. Stef On Mar 23, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Max Leske wrote:
Ok, will do.
Max
On 22.03.2011, at 18:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Max if you want to help what you can do is to have a look at the Filesystem chapter in the pharo by example vol 2 on github. We will update it and probably should do several passes on the chapter anyway. Stef
Yes, I understand that. My question is if I should create entries for the "old" version since that one is working and has working extensions.
Max
On 22.03.2011, at 13:37, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
Stef
On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
Hey
I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
My suggestion:
---- Pharo Tools ---- ---- Filesystem ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2 ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated. What do you think?
Max
participants (3)
-
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Max Leske -
Stéphane Ducasse