Max, don't worry too much about that. The idea is just to have a list of the available tools and a little description of what they are. Think of this for business or newcomers. If they go ahead with Pharo, then they will probably ask in the mailing list if they have a problem running/installing a tool. So, what you said, is good for me.

Cheers

mariano

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I understand that. My question is if I should create entries for the "old" version since that one is working and has working extensions.

Max


On 22.03.2011, at 13:37, St�phane Ducasse wrote:

> right now we are stuck because we started documenting and understanding FS and coling publihsed a new one and he should merge our changes
>
> Stef
>
> On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Max Leske wrote:
>
>> Hey
>>
>> I miss Filesystem and its extensions (cURL, zip, git etc.) in the Pharo book. I'd write the entries but I want your oppinion on whether we should wait till the Filesystem rewrite in 1.2 is ready.
>>
>> My suggestion:
>>
>> ---- Pharo Tools
>> ---- ---- Filesystem
>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.1
>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>> ---- ---- ---- Filesystem for Pharo 1.2
>> ---- ---- ---- ---- extensions 1 ...n
>>
>> Should we even list the "old" versions? The downside to that is that we would have to wait for all the extensions to be updated.
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Max
>>
>>
>
>