On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:

On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:36 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>wrote:

...

On Apr 4, 2011, at 4:58 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

...

I started to try to release 1.2. Not only I did the list of changes but also:

1) I asked if people still wanted the background: http://forum.world.st/Do-you-want-to-add-the-background-picture-to-the-image... results: negative. So, no backgrund. White as it is now.

2) I asked what people wanted that used to be in 1.1: http://forum.world.st/Do-we-want-this-for-Pharo-1-2-and-futures-td3350721.ht... guess how many replies? TWO. results: I would only nclude the installScript. I guess that Hudson could do that very easy, doesn't it ? marcus ?

https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%201.2/lastSuccessfulBuild/a...

Excellent! and that be included in the zip that hudson creates for the dev images?

It used to be in there. But then people where thinking that it is a startup file that is executed when the image starts up... maybe by renaming it this would get clearer?

ok, I understand. So yes, or a better name or...... if someone really needs to know that the build script was, then it means: 1) that he is aware of PharoCore / PharoDev 2) That he wants to reproduce the build, or fix a bug, or something. For me, both thins means that such guy is not a beginner/newbie. So we can assume that he also knows where to search such file in hudson ? if true...then we don't include the file...

Marcus

-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com