On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:

On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:36 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:



On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:

On Apr 4, 2011, at 4:58 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> I started to try to release 1.2. Not only I did the list of changes but also:
>
> 1) I asked if people still wanted the background: http://forum.world.st/Do-you-want-to-add-the-background-picture-to-the-image-like-we-did-with-Pharo-1-1-td3350726.html#a3355332
> results: negative. So, no backgrund. White as it is now.
>
> 2) I asked what people wanted that used to be in 1.1: �http://forum.world.st/Do-we-want-this-for-Pharo-1-2-and-futures-td3350721.html
> guess how many replies? TWO.
> results: I would only nclude the installScript. I guess that Hudson could do that very easy, doesn't it ? �marcus ?
>

https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%201.2/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Pharo-1.2/Pharo-1.2.st


Excellent!� and that be included in the zip that hudson creates for the dev images?

It used to be in there. But then people where thinking that it is a startup file that is executed when the image starts up... maybe by renaming it this would get clearer?


ok, I understand. So yes, or a better name or...... if someone really needs to know that the build script was, then it means:

1) that he is aware of PharoCore / PharoDev
2) That he wants to reproduce the build, or fix a bug, or something.

For me, both thins means that such guy is not a beginner/newbie. So we can assume that he also knows where to search such file in hudson ?� if true...then we don't include the file...

Marcus


--
Marcus Denker �--�http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.




--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com