Hi, if you look closely at the attached screenshots, you will find that being sloppy is a side-effect of modern times! The "unclassified" method category is missing from both the Smalltalk 76 and Smalltalk 80 tools. Fernando On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:

Ok but in 3.0 We will kill that bad habit. We should investigate in an automatic categorizer. There was one I should have a look one of these days (since I do not know what to do :)).

Stef

...

Code with "as yet unclassified" methods should be rejected by the monkey !

Ben

On Jan 29, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:

...

On Jan 29, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Ben Coman wrote:

...

While on the topic, some of the category chooser dialogs are sorted so

that the extensions are listed first - which I find annoying (in 1.4). In 2.0 can the standard categories be shown first ?

...

...

Also, I still struggle to really be confident I am choosing the right

categories. Perhaps down the track, a feature useful for newcomers might be a tooltip when hovering over items on the category list, or alternatively, hover showing a list of the ten most common methods appearing in that category.

could be really neat :)

...

cheers -ben

Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

Hi guys

I spend my time recategorizing methods. I would like the change the intention of 'as yet unclassified'

because this is a PLAGUE.

...

...

It is like throwing papers on the floor. So we should have a different name to indicate that it should be fixed.

Any ideas?

'you are a dirty programmer - change me'

Stef