Ok but in 3.0
We will kill that bad habit.
We should investigate in an automatic categorizer. There was one I should have a look one of these days (since I do not know what to do :)).

Stef

> Code with "as yet unclassified" methods should be rejected by the monkey !
>

> Ben

>
> On Jan 29, 2013, at 11:19 PM, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
>>
>>> While on the topic, some of the category chooser dialogs are sorted so that the extensions are listed first - which I find annoying (in 1.4). � In 2.0 can the standard categories be shown first ?
>>>
>>> Also, I still struggle to really be confident I am choosing the right categories. �Perhaps down the track, a feature useful for newcomers might be a tooltip when hovering over items on the category list, or alternatively, hover showing a list of the ten most common methods appearing in that category.
>>
>> could be really neat :)
>>
>>>
>>> cheers -ben
>>>
>>> St�phane Ducasse wrote:
>>>> Hi guys
>>>>
>>>> I spend my time recategorizing methods.
>>>> I would like the change the intention of 'as yet unclassified' because this is a PLAGUE.
>>>> It is like throwing papers on the floor.
>>>> So we should have a different name to indicate that it should be fixed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>> 'you are a dirty programmer - change me'
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>